|
|||||||
当前位置:
首页»科研成果» 2013
纪多颖、John Moore与合作者在JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH发表论文
全球院
The hydrological impact of geoengineering in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP)
Simone Tilmes,1 John Fasullo,1 Jean-Francois Lamarque1, Daniel R. Marsh1, Michael Mills1, Kari Alterskjær2, Helene Muri2, Jón E. Kristjánsson2, Olivier Boucher3, Michael Schulz3, Jason N. S. Cole4, Charles L. Curry5, Andy Jones6, Jim Haywood6,7, Peter J. Irvine8, Duoying Ji9, John C. Moore9, Diana B. Karam10, Ben Kravitz11, Philip J. Rasch11, Balwinder Singh11, Jin-Ho Yoon11, Ulrike Niemeier12, Hauke Schmidt12, Alan Robock13, Shuting Yang14, Shingo Watanabe15
1National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, USA. 2Department of Geosciences, Meteorology and Oceanography Section, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. 3Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique, IPSL, CNRS/UPMC, Paris, France. 4Canadian Centre for Climate Modeling and Analysis, Environment Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 5School of Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada. 6Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, UK. 7Exeter Climate Systems, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK. 7Exeter Climate Systems, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK. 8Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies, Potsdam, Germany. 9State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, College of Global Change and Earth System Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China. 10Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et l’Environnement, CEA, CNRS, UVSQ, Gif-sur-Yvette, France. 11Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA. 12Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany. 13Department of Environmental Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA. 14Danish Meteorological Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark. 15Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Yokohama, Japan.
Abstract The hydrological impact of enhancing Earth's albedo by solar radiation management is investigated using simulations from 12 Earth System models contributing to the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP). We contrast an idealized experiment, G1, where the global mean radiative forcing is kept at preindustrial conditions by reducing insolation while the CO2 concentration is quadrupled to a 4×CO2 experiment. The reduction of evapotranspiration over land with instantaneously increasing CO2 concentrations in both experiments largely contributes to an initial reduction in evaporation. A warming surface associated with the transient adjustment in 4×CO2 generates an increase of global precipitation by around 6.9% with large zonal and regional changes in both directions, including a precipitation increase of 10% over Asia and a reduction of 7% for the North American summer monsoon. Reduced global evaporation persists in G1 with temperatures close to preindustrial conditions. Global precipitation is reduced by around 4.5%, and significant reductions occur over monsoonal land regions: East Asia (6%), South Africa (5%), North America (7%), and South America (6%). The general precipitation performance in models is discussed in comparison to observations. In contrast to the 4×CO2 experiment, where the frequency of months with heavy precipitation intensity is increased by over 50% in comparison to the control, a reduction of up to 20% is simulated in G1. These changes in precipitation in both total amount and frequency of extremes point to a considerable weakening of the hydrological cycle in a geoengineered world.
KEY WORDS: geoengineering; hydrological cycle; climate change; GeoMIP; solar radiation management; monsoon
PUBLISHED BY: JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2013, 118 (19): 11036-11058.
DOWNLOAD PDF: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgrd.50868/pdf |
|||||||
|