|
|||||||
当前位置:
首页»科研成果» 2013
纪多颖、John Moore在JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH发表论文
全球院
Climate model response from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP)
Ben Kravitz,1 Ken Caldeira,2 Olivier Boucher,3 Alan Robock,4 Philip J. Rasch,1 Kari Alterskjær,5 Diana Bou Karam,6 Jason N. S. Cole,7 Charles L. Curry,8 James M. Haywood,9,10 Peter J. Irvine,11 Duoying Ji,12 Andy Jones,9 Jón Egill Kristjánsson,5 Daniel J. Lunt,13 John C. Moore,12 Ulrike Niemeier,14 Hauke Schmidt,14 Michael Schulz,15 Balwinder Singh,1 Simone Tilmes,16 Shingo Watanabe,17 Shuting Yang,18 and Jin-Ho Yoon1
1Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA; 2Department of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, California, USA; 3Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique, IPSL, CNRS/UPMC, Paris, France; 4Department of Environmental Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA; 5Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; 6Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement, CEA/ CNRS/UVSQ, Saclay, France; 7Canadian Centre for Climate Modeling and Analysis, Environment Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 8School of Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada; 9Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, UK; 10College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK; 11Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies, Potsdam, Germany; 12State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, College of Global Change and Earth System Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China; 13School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; 14Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany; 15Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway; 16National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, USA; 17Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Yokohama, Japan; 18Danish Meteorological Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Abstract Solar geoengineering—deliberate reduction in the amount of solar radiation retained by the Earth—has been proposed as a means of counteracting some of the climatic effects of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. We present results from Experiment G1 of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project, in which 12 climate models have simulated the climate response to an abrupt quadrupling of CO2 from preindustrial concentrations brought into radiative balance via a globally uniform reduction in insolation. Models show this reduction largely offsets global mean surface temperature increases due to quadrupled CO2 concentrations and prevents 97% of the Arctic sea ice loss that would otherwise occur under high CO2 levels but, compared to the preindustrial climate, leaves the tropics cooler (−0.3 K) and the poles warmer (+0.8 K). Annual mean precipitation minus evaporation anomalies for G1 are less than 0.2 mm day−1 in magnitude over 92% of the globe, but some tropical regions receive less precipitation, in part due to increased moist static stability and suppression of convection. Global average net primary productivity increases by 120% in G1 over simulated preindustrial levels, primarily from CO2 fertilization, but also in part due to reduced plant heat stress compared to a high CO2 world with no geoengineering. All models show that uniform solar geoengineering in G1 cannot simultaneously return regional and global temperature and hydrologic cycle intensity to preindustrial levels.
Key Words: geoengineering; model intercomparison
PUBLISHED BY: JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: ATMOSPHERES, 2013, 118 (15): 8320-8332. DOWNLOAD PDF: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgrd.50646/pdf |
|||||||
|